Différences entre versions de « PenName »
De Mi caja de notas
| (2 versions intermédiaires par le même utilisateur non affichées) | |||
| Ligne 1 : | Ligne 1 : | ||
| − | Personas, | + | Personas, Nom de Plume, « Nom de scène » in French.<ref>PenName has nothing to do with [[Marine]].</ref> |
{{citation-fr | {{citation-fr | ||
|url= https://theconversation.com/online-anonymity-study-found-stable-pseudonyms-created-a-more-civil-environment-than-real-user-names-171374 | |url= https://theconversation.com/online-anonymity-study-found-stable-pseudonyms-created-a-more-civil-environment-than-real-user-names-171374 | ||
| Ligne 6 : | Ligne 6 : | ||
|author = Alfred Moore - The Conversation | |author = Alfred Moore - The Conversation | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
| Ligne 18 : | Ligne 16 : | ||
Therefore, at least on this basis, acceptance or rejection of pseudonyms is merely a neutral value judgment. | Therefore, at least on this basis, acceptance or rejection of pseudonyms is merely a neutral value judgment. | ||
| + | Source [[meatball:PenName|meatball community]] | ||
| + | <!-- | ||
See also: [[meatball:SemanticsOfIdentity]], [[meatball:IdentityValidation]], [[meatball:VulnerabilityToCommunity]], [[meatball:EnforceResponsibility]], [[meatball:BasisForPseudonymity]], [[meatball:FocusOnIdentity]]. | See also: [[meatball:SemanticsOfIdentity]], [[meatball:IdentityValidation]], [[meatball:VulnerabilityToCommunity]], [[meatball:EnforceResponsibility]], [[meatball:BasisForPseudonymity]], [[meatball:FocusOnIdentity]]. | ||
| + | --> | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
Version actuelle datée du 22 février 2022 à 05:25
Personas, Nom de Plume, « Nom de scène » in French.[1] 2021-11-17 : Online anonymity: study found ‘stable pseudonyms’ created a more civil environment than real user names
Moreover, personas are part of our everyday lives; we display different personalities to different people or groups of people.
However, the tradition of pen names has both good and bad examples. Hence it is fallacious to appeal to that; the possibility of pseudonyms does not imply their desirability. Moreover, MeatBall is emphatically not a masquerade ball, wherein the use of elaborate personas is significant.
However, this merely implies that pseudonymity itself is neutral. It is likewise fallacious to claim that bad uses (DramaticIdentity, ostentation, trolling, etc.) invalidate pseudonymity itself.
Therefore, at least on this basis, acceptance or rejection of pseudonyms is merely a neutral value judgment.
Source meatball community