Différences entre versions de « Content management system »

Version du 14 février 2020 à 05:06

[Échec de la récupération du modèle pour https://indieweb.org/content_management_system-fr?action=render : HTTP 404]

This article is a stub. You can help the IndieWeb wiki by expanding it.

A content management system (often abbreviated as CMS) is software used to create, enter, edit, update, delete content on websites; some CMSs are used for IndieWeb sites, see the tables on this page for current usage.

Why

CMS are meant to make creating and managing content easier. In many ways, they can give you the ease-of-use that silos generally provide. In addition, a CMS usually comes with well defined structures for your content and with plugins to give you indie functionality such as webmentions. If a CMS isn't good enough to change your behaviour to post to your own site first / instead of a silo (e.g. plenty of "old school" bloggers that tweet but fail to post notes on their own site), then that CMS is not good (and you should thus write your own or improve another, whichever is easier.).

To CMS or not to CMS?

Using an existing, proven CMS can be the most effortless way of getting an indieweb site, though it nearly always requires a little bit of tinkering.

Nearly all CMSs have a web-based editor that is easy to use for creating, updating, deleting posts, whereas SSGs typically* require you to edit text files, often in Markdown format, and deal with syncing them to your server, regenerating, and setting up / maintaining external services for features like Webmention sending/receiving, Micropub support etc. *There are also static site CMSs with the friendly user interface of a CMS combined with the freedom of not needing to "run" a CMS to serve your pages/posts.

Many members of our community use a CMS. However, many don't. Some use static pages which they edit in an editor or use a static site generator (SSG). While not as convenient as a CMS, those solutions may work just as well for you.

Use an existing CMS or write your own?

"Hmmm I want to write a blog post maybe I should build my own blogging engine" — @iamdevloper 2021-04-09

The question of whether to use an existing CMS or to write your own could (and should) be expanded to:

Service. Using a service like micro.blog, Tumblr, Blogger)
CMS. Setup and maintain a CMS like one listed in the #Examples below
SSG. Setup and maintain and tinker with a static site generator (too many to list)
Write your own CMS (or SSG, or some other approach!), inspired by existing projects

Why re-use a CMS

Why you should re-use an existing CMS, and help contribute to it:

There's no way around a little bit of tinkering. But using an existing, proven CMS can be the most effortless way of getting an indie website.
Leverage the fruits of labor (millions of hours!) other people and CMS communities have invested.
Benefit from domain experts in those communities. Watching for exploits and quickly shipping security patches is a key example. Small independent CMSes may generally be smaller targets, but are also less secure and hardened.
Spend your time and energy on other projects that are more likely to be adopted by others and benefit the community
- It takes a large amount of duplicated effort to get even a *barely* decent CMS, and almost all of that effort is duplicated
It's usually a better use of effort, more collaborative and inspiring, and more community-oriented to join and improve an existing CMS like Known than build your own from scratch
If you're not scratching your own itches as easily or fast as you'd like or making your CMS as or more awesome/beautiful than silos, then yes, stop writing your own CMS and use an existing one.

Why write your own

Why you should write your own CMS for your personal web site, in short:

Scratch your own itches
As long as people are posting to silos *instead of* posting to their own site, we lack good CMSs, and you should help by starting with your own.
- Make it as awesome / beautiful or more than any silo you currently use
- Nearly all existing CMSs suck at UI/UX compared to silos.
A "barely decent" CMS may be exactly what more people can use - not these overdesigned behemoths that require nasty sysadmin work and have tons of regular security exploits
People here have built amazing things because they started with the freedom and low learning curve of their own CMS
More CMSs means more ways to rapidly iterate with UI - catching up in UI/UX is the #1 thing we're behind on compared to silos
Existing communities tend to be monoculture laden and slower to change, slower to iterate, and may not share your priorities (e.g feature parity with silos).

From Twitter:

https://twitter.com/helenhousandi/status/998379752133218305
- "By age 35, you should have written your own CMS at least once." @helenhousandi May 20, 2018

Articles advocating your own

2003-04-23 Jeffrey Zeldman Unsyndicate
2003-04-23 Tantek Çelik Rolling your own

Examples

A list of CMS that IndieWeb community members use and which you too can use!

If you use any of these, please also add yourself to the rightmost column (bolded if you're a founder/primary developer of that CMS), and to the IndieWeb Examples section of that CMSs page.

Please also see our projects where community members show how their sites are built.


Name / Url(s)	Tech	Pricing	Plugins / building-blocks	I use this!
Craft	PHP / MySQL	Free (personal use), Paid (commercial use)	Webmention for Craft 2 (not compatible with Craft 3)	Matthias
Drupal	PHP + SQL database	Open Source (GPL)	Webmention, micropub, microformats, Microsub link exposure, IndieAuth via plugin	Kristof De Jaeger Ravisagar.in
Kirby CMS	PHP / flat files	Personal + Commercial licenses	Webmentions	Bastian
Known	PHP	Open-Source (Apache2), hosted version currently only for organisations	Webmention, Micropub natively, Plugins	👥 lots of people
Micro.blog		Commercial ($5/month)	Webmention, Micropub, rel-me, IndieAuth, microformats	Manton Reece, Jean MacDonald
Perch	PHP / MySQL	Commercial license	Webmention	Drew McLellan, Scott Gruber, Clive Walker
ProcessWire	PHP / MySQL	Free (+ commercial modules)	Webmention, IndieAuth plugins	gRegor Morrill
TYPO3	PHP / MySQL	Free (+ commercial/professional support plans)	Indieweb Publishing Tools (Webmention)	Joschi Kuphal
WordPress	PHP / MySQL	Open-Source (+ commercial hosting/support)	Indieweb Plugin • Webmention • Semantic Linkbacks • Micropub • IndieAuth • Post Kinds • Syndication Links • WebSub plugins • and more	👥 lots of people

There's more. Please help keep this register updated. Here is a list of all pages marked as CMSes in the wiki:

To add to this list, create a page for the CMS and include [[Category:CMS]]

These should be added to the table above:

Microblog.pub

Main article: microblog.pub

microblog.pub is self-hostable, single-user, IndieWeb friendly microblogging open source software based on ActivityPub which supports many IndieWeb building blocks including IndieAuth, microformats2, Micropub, and Webmention. See also documentation at https://sr.ht/~tsileo/microblog.pub/

Elgg

Main article: Elgg

Elgg is a self-hostable social networking CMS. As of 2023-01-03 it can support microformats2, Webmention, and Microsub via a plugin.

Private Examples

Some CMS are used by indieweb community members but are not (yet?) available for others to install or use. They're still good to check out for ideas:


Name / Url(s)	Tech	Pricing	Plugins / Building blocks	I use this!
Falcon	PHP/CASSIS	some open source, otherwise private/na	IndieWeb friendly building blocks support	Tantek Çelik
p3k	PHP	some open source, otherwise private/na	--	Aaron Parecki

Other Examples

Some CMS are not currently used by any indieweb community members may be available for others to install or use. Take a look and if you use one of these, move it to the first table, and add yourself in the right column!


Name / Url(s)	Tech	Pricing	Plugins / Building blocks	I use this!
AerosolCMS	nodeJS	--	--	Oliver (who? please link to your wiki page / home page)
Ghost	nodeJS	Personal + Commercial licenses	--	--
MODX CMS	PHP / MySQL	--	--	--

Defunct

CityDesk was a Windows desktop based CMS from Fog Creek software for simple websites.
...

Version du 14 février 2020 à 05:06 (voir la source) Xtof (discussion \| contributions) (Page créée avec « {{:iwc:content_management_system}} »)		Version du 14 février 2020 à 05:06 (voir la source) Xtof (discussion \| contributions) Modification suivante →
Ligne 1 :		Ligne 1 :
		+	{{:iwc:content_management_system-fr}}
		+
	{{:iwc:content_management_system}}		{{:iwc:content_management_system}}